Re: Failed building GTK with the DFB backend
- From: Attilio Fiandrotti <fiandro tiscali it>
- To: Suman Kar <skar tataelxsi co in>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org, amirthakaruna tataelxsi co in
- Subject: Re: Failed building GTK with the DFB backend
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:50:53 +0200
I apologize for my mistake: only now i realize taht getposition() and
getsize() were introduced *after* DFB 0.9.25 was released!
Yesterday mike checked in a patch ("Added ifdef to compile with 0.9.24
removes creating a child GdkWindow since it u...") that allows GTK+ to
be compiled against DFB >= 0.9.24 (so, also 0.9.25 will do)
The correct recipe is:
DFB >= 0.9.24
GTK+ HEAD from CVS
Attilio
Suman Kar wrote:
Hello Attilio,
Let me try to explain Karuna's problem: we are using the
downloadable source tarball from
http://directfb.org/index.php?path=Main%2FDownloads:
DirectFB-0.9.25.1.tar.gz
Also, this was released on 03-May-2006. Mike's checkin has happened
on 11-June-2006. Moreover, we could not find the GetPosition()
member in either the http://directfb.org/index.php?path=Main%2FNews
page or in the source files Mike has mentioned in the mail to
the directFB list.
These indicates to me that this is not really an issue with some path
variable as you suggested. Your inputs are awaited.
Regards,
Suman.
-----Original Message-----
From: Attilio Fiandrotti [mailto:fiandro tiscali it]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:03 PM
To: karuna karan
Cc: skar tataelxsi co in; amirthakaruna tataelxsi co in
Subject: Re: Failed building GTK with the DFB backend
the symbol GetPosition (and getsize, too) were introduced in DFB 0.9.25
: if you're trying to compile GTKDFB against DFB 0.9.25, then you must
have provided wrong pkg_config_path or ld_library_path
Attilio
karuna karan wrote:
hi,
we are already working with DirectFB 0.9.25.1 and GTK 2.9.4(released)
we will start work with GTK 2.9.4 from CVS as suggested by you.
we will get back if any issue arises.
Thanks,
Karunakaran A.
>From: Attilio Fiandrotti <fiandro tiscali it>
>A couple of days ago mike checked in the patch that excludes from
>compilation some extra code that requires DFB 0.9.25 in the case DFN
0.9.24
>is used.
>Use CVS sources or apply to GTK 2.9.4 gdkdirectfb.h and
>gdkwindow-directfb.c from current SVN.
>If you're a Debian user and run on i386, simply install cairodfb and
gtkdfb
>packages [1] which were made recently available (other archs will follow
>soon).
>
>Attilio
>
>[1]
http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2006-June/001973.html
>
>karuna karan wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>we have tried to build gtk+ 2.9.4 with backend dfb.
>>we got the follwing error while building,
>>
>>gdkwindow-directfb.c: In function `gdk_directfb_create_child_window':
>>gdkwindow-directfb.c:2508: error: structure has no member named
>>`GetPosition'
>>make[4]: *** [gdkwindow-directfb.lo] Error 1
>>make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/new/gtk+-2.9.4/gdk/directfb'
>>make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/new/gtk+-2.9.4/gdk'
>>make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
>>make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/new/gtk+-2.9.4/gdk'
>>make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/new/gtk+-2.9.4'
>>make: *** [all] Error 2
>>
>>so kindly give feedback on this issue..
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Karunakaran A.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: Suman Kar <skar tataelxsi co in>
>>>Reply-To: Suman Kar <skar tataelxsi co in>
>>>To: "'Attilio Fiandrotti'" <fiandro tiscali it>, "'karuna
karan'"
>>><mail2karuna hotmail com>
>>>CC: <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
>>>Subject: RE: Failed building GTK with the DFB backend
>>>Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:51:13 +0530
>>>
>>>Hello Attilio,
>>>
>>>Thanks for the quick update. However, the problem goes away when we
added
>>>the following:
>>>
>>>gboolean
>>>gdk_screen_is_composited (GdkScreen *screen)
>>>{
>>> g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen), NULL);
>>> return FALSE;
>>>}
>>>
>>>
>>>is added to gdkscreen-directfb.c (from
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2006-May/msg00210.html ).
>>>
>>>We will definitely try building gtk+2.9.4 and will get back in case
there
are any issues.
One more thing: we would be really interested in gtk+-2.10. Any
idea when
this will be out?
Regards,
Suman.
-----Original Message-----
From: Attilio Fiandrotti [mailto:fiandro tiscali it]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:40 PM
To: karuna karan
Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org; skar tataelxsi co in
Subject: Re: Failed building GTK with the DFB backend
karuna karan wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to build gtk 2.9.1 with directFB backend with following
dependencies,
DFB support in was broken: you should try 2.9.4 or follow instructions
in the wiki page to build from sratch.
If you're a debian user, you can also use precompiled i386 official
packages that were built this week
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/ <-cairodfb
http://people.debian.org/~joss/packages/ <-gtkdfb
Attilio
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s)and
may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender or
administrator tataelxsi co in
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s)and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender or
administrator tataelxsi co in
_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender or administrator tataelxsi co in
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]