Re: Depending on C99 (Re: GtkBindingSignal changes)
- From: Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>
- To: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>, Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr>
- Subject: Re: Depending on C99 (Re: GtkBindingSignal changes)
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:35:12 +0100
On 05.01.2006 12:01, Tim Janik wrote:
[...]
could people please speak up if they think depending on C99 would
be a bad idea for glib & gtk+
I do think this is a bad idea. See below and other mails.
(e.g. with the next major release) and
why this would be a problem for them?
To me this change sounds as reasonable as compiling all of Gtk+ as C++.
in the end, the w32 compilers are C99 compliant i'd assume and on
None of the win32 compilers I use (msvc 6.0 - 7.1, OpenWatcom latest)
is C99 compliant.
older unixes when there're no modern compilers available, there's
always a C99 compliant gcc that can be used.
Is there *any other* compiler than GCC being C99 compliant ?
Hans
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it. -- Dilbert
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]