Re: Fwd: Re: Depending on C99 (Re: GtkBindingSignal changes)
- From: Tim Janik <timj imendio com>
- To: Mike Emmel <mike emmel gmail com>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <GTK-DEVEL-LIST gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Depending on C99 (Re: GtkBindingSignal changes)
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:11:42 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Mike Emmel wrote:
On 1/5/06, Tim Janik <timj imendio com> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, ANDREW PAPROCKI, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN wrote:
I disagree with this completely. We compile all of our code on Solaris/AIX with
SunPRO cc & IBM xlc without c99 extensions enabled for our own reasons.
please tell us what kind of reasons those are. considering and re-evaluating them
is exactly what this thread is for ;)
Well if issues like this are going to come up I did some investigation
on using libffi for signal dispatch and my conclusion was it would be
significantly faster then the current dispatch system.
Just food for thought.
it wouldn't, i evaluated it for emission when i wrote the
marshaller generation code for GSignal.
Mike
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]