Re: Fwd: Re: Depending on C99 (Re: GtkBindingSignal changes)

[Mike Emmel <mike emmel gmail com>]

On 1/5/06, Tim Janik <timj imendio com> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, ANDREW PAPROCKI, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN wrote:
>
> > I disagree with this completely. We compile all of our code on Solaris/AIX with
> > SunPRO cc & IBM xlc without c99 extensions enabled for our own reasons.
>
> please tell us what kind of reasons those are. considering and re-evaluating them
> is exactly what this thread is for ;)
>

Well if issues like this are going to come up I did some investigation
on using libffi for signal dispatch and my conclusion was it would be
significantly faster then the current dispatch system.
Just food for thought.
Mike

> > Code can
> > take advantage of c99 features, but only if they can be abstracted out in
> > gmacros/config.h/etc.
> >
> > Andrew Paprocki
> > Bloomberg LP
>
> ---
> ciaoTJ
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>