RE: Typedef inconsistency for gsize and gssize



> 
> It should generally be opaque to the user that gsize is not
> a typedef for size_t, so you could definitely define it that way for
> the LSB. However, you'd need to include a footnote to the effect:
> 
>  1) This definition should not be taken to imply that including
>     glib.h necessarily includes stddef.h.

Ok. LSB's GLIB spec will have typedef size_t gsize; and 
similarly typedef ssize_t gssize;

thanks,

-Rajesh



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]