Re: Typedef inconsistency for gsize and gssize
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: "Banginwar, Rajesh" <rajesh banginwar intel com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Typedef inconsistency for gsize and gssize
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 07:05:25 -0500
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 18:39 -0800, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote:
> Hello,
> For IA32 gsize (found in glibconfig.h) is defined as: typedef
> unsigned int gsize;
> For IA32-64bit extn and IA64 (Itanium) the definition is:
> typedef unsigned long gsize;
>
> Is this intentional? The documentation does not mention anything about
> this.. It says: unsigned int only
>
>
> The question is in LSB context. What is the correct way of typedefing
> this?
What we try to do is to to match the type of size_t on the system;
for 64-bit platforms, that isn't really a problem ... size_t will
be 'unsigned long', but on 32-bit platforms it could either by
'unsigned int' or 'unsigned long'.
(Matching the type prevents certain warnings when passing a size_t
to a function expecting a gsize or vice-versa.)
So, the most accurate definition you could give is
'typedef gsize size_t', except that glib.h does *not* include
stddef.h so it's not literally that in the header files.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]