Re: GTK_MODULE (G)Option breakage & init ordering ...
- From: James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>
- To: michael meeks novell com
- Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, accessibility mailing list <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>, Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>, bonobo <gnome-components-list gnome org>, Gtk Hackers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GTK_MODULE (G)Option breakage & init ordering ...
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:01:26 +0800
michael meeks wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:04 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
>
>>I have vague memory that modules not getting arguments is intentional
>>rather than an oversight ... that we discussed it at the point of the
>>GOption switch and decided it was fundamentally busted and
>>unsupportable.
>>
>>I may just be inventing that memory...
>>
>>
>
> :-) Either way - there is a workaround now; and as Federico says prolly
>going via the environment is a more robust & cleaner solution.
>
>
The only issue with using the environment is that it is inherited by
child processes. This might cause a program to think it is being
invoked as a factory when it isn't.
James.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]