Re: GLib trees

On 12/26/06, Samuel Cormier-Iijima <sciyoshi gmail com> wrote:

This, however, is slightly more complicated, and the performance
benefits would only be noticed in very large sets of data - I wasn't
sure if GLib was designed for performance or simplicity and
convenience. Any thoughts on this?

We have always maintained the position that GLib shouldn't provide
more than one implementation of a given data type. See e.g. Owen's
mail from some time ago:


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]