Optimization possible in g_object_set_valist?

Hi everyone,

I wanted to ask if anyone has considered why g_object_set_valist() is passing 0 
as the flags argument to G_VALUE_COLLECT() when calling object_set_property(). 
By not passing G_VALUE_NOCOPY_CONTENTS, a string value will be dup'd first. 
Since the GValue is passed to the function and then unset immediately following 
the object_set_property() call, it seems as if a copy is not required, as the 
user code executed in object_set_property() would g_value_dup_string() if 

I'm going to experiment with this locally, but are there any historical reasons 
for wanting to copy the GValue before calling object_set_property()?


Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]