Re: RFC: warnings on ignoring return value on some list operations

On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 11:58 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:

> i think that is a really good idea. however i'm more of the opinion that all
> list functions should have the warn_unused_result tag. code and conditions
> are easily changed, moved around or pasted so that missing the return value
> assignment for lists will become a problem. i.e. even if you know you're
> appending to a non-empty list, you should still write
> list = g_list_append (list, data);
> so i'd apprchiate if you extended the patch to cover all list functions
> that return possibly modified lists ;)

What happened to compatibility?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]