gtk_action_group_add_action_with_accel() question
- From: Jeff Franks <jcf tpg com au>
- To: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: gtk_action_group_add_action_with_accel() question
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:37:25 +1100
Jody,
I've been talking with Matthias Clasen about bug 125322 and I'm writing
a patch that adds gtk_(whatever)_action_new() functions. Now that
your've added gtk_action_group_add_action_with_accel() it makes things
easier but there is some argument overlap. For example, gtk_action_new()
would look like this:
GtkAction*
gtk_action_new (const gchar *name,
const gchar *label,
const gchar *tooltip,
const gchar *stock_id)
{
GtkAction *action;
action = g_object_new (GTK_TYPE_ACTION,
"name", name,
"label", label,
"tooltip", tooltip,
"stock_id", stock_id,
NULL);
return action;
}
Then the g_object_new() call in gtk_action_group_add_actions_full()
could be replaced by a call to gtk_action_new():
action = gtk_action_new (entries[i].name,
label,
tooltip,
entries[i].stock_id,
NULL);
To add an action created by gtk_action_new() you would have to call the
new gtk_action_group_add_action_with_accel() function;
GtkAction *action;
action = gtk_action_new (name, label, tooltip, stock_id);
gtk_action_group_add_with_accel (action_group, action, name, accel,
stock_id);
Doesn't it seem unecessary to create an action with a name and stock_id
and then have to specify the name and stock_id again when you add it to
an action group. The GtkAction already stores this information. I just
wanted to run this past you before submitting any patch, so I can get
the code right.
Jeff Franks.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]