Re: File selector talk writeup
- From: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: File selector talk writeup
- Date: 13 Feb 2003 21:06:45 -0500
Hi Owen,
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 12:23, Owen Taylor wrote:
> http://people.redhat.com/otaylor/fosdem2003/file-selector.html
>
> Has a writeup of the talk I gave on Sunday at FOSDEM.
Hi Owen,
thanks for posting this, it is very nice.
I think I agree on almost everything you wrote, but I have a few
comments/questions on my own...
* Filtering.
I don't think much freedom should be given to the programmer in
this. The dialog API should either go the OS X way (specify what
types are allowed to be selected, and only show files of those
types to the user), or the Windows way (specify a set of groups
of types like "JPEG files", "PNG files", "Image files" etc and
let the user pick). Of course, the user should be allowed to do
pattern-based filtering, but I don't see a reason to make that
programmatically controlled.
Allowing the programmer to make complicated custom filters (e.g.
via merging simple filters or allowing filter callbacks) is
unnecessary, and also increases the chance that the programmer does
something unexpected and confusing (we know how we are).
Besides, if one really wants total customization, it is possible
to write a different implementation for the underlying "file system"
interface.
(Also, the filter probably makes the most sense in the Open dialog
and slightly less sense in the Save dialog, and I think I like the
OS X way of filtering more than the Windows way.)
* Addition of simple controls
It is mentioned in the writeup that it should be possible to add a
simple control like "Open read-only" to the dialog. But custom
widgets in the file chooser are kinda evil (since they end up being
inconsistent across applications, and programmers like to do any
sorts of funny things with them); so it would probably be better
come up with a more strict interface than "add a control to the
no-constraints zone".
For example, we could lock down what kinds of controls are allowed
go there and add specific interfaces for them, without allowing any
further customization. Right now I can only think of two: "open
read only" (for the open dialog) and "save in format X" (for the
save dialog). I'd like the API to have explicit calls to handle
these cases, but no fancy do-it-yourself hooks.
* Other things
- Is it really necessary to have a separate, embeddable version of
the dialog (i.e. the GtkWidget) instead of just the GtkDialog? I
can't think of a sane reason why you would want to embed it, so
I'd stick with just the GtkDialog myself...
- MIME types. How is a GtkFileChooserSimple going to know about the
file types? Adding something to do MIME type recognition in GTK
doesn't sound fun nor good.
- There should be a special mode for selecting directories.
(Although, the Windows custom of using a tree control is probably
not a good idea.)
- For bookmarks and recent directories, we probably need specs on
freedesktop.org?
* Helping out
What is the best way to help at this point? Would it be helpful if
I started to write up some APIs?
-- Ettore
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]