Re: GNOME CVS: gtk+ yosh
- From: Manish Singh <yosh gimp org>
- To: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: gtk+ yosh
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:38:08 -0700
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 01:09:22PM -0400, jacob berkman wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 15:10, Gnome CVS User wrote:
> > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome
> > Module name: gtk+
> > Changes by: yosh 02/10/07 15:10:39
> > Log message:
> > Mon Oct 7 11:59:33 2002 Manish Singh <yosh gimp org>
> > * gtk/gtkliststore.[ch] gtk/gtktreedatalist.[ch] gtk/gtktreednd.c
> > gtk/gtktreemodel.[ch] gtk/gtktreemodelsort.[ch]
> > gtk/gtktreeselection.[ch] gtk/gtktreesortable.[ch]
> > gtk/gtktreestore.[ch]: Deprecation cleanup
> this has broken compilation of gconf-editor, which uses GTK_CHECK_CAST()
> after including gtktreemodel.h (which are no longer defined after just
> including that file).
> should these headers include the header which supplies those macros, or
> should it just be fixed in gconf-editor?
gconf-editor should be using the GObject equivalents.
But, what is the policy on maintaining individual header file compatibility
for the 2.x series? Is including bits of gtk headers by external projects
supported? If so, I'll revert that bit of the header file change.
] [Thread Prev