Re: 2.1.3 plans

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:

> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Owen Taylor wrote:
> 
> >
> > Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm planning to do a GLib/GTK+-2.1.3 releases this weekend
> > > > or early next week.
> > > >
> > > > I'd like at least the GTK+ release to be declared API frozen;
> > > > I'm aware only of one open API issue in GtkTreeView, plus
> > > > a couple of semi-api-ish things (a patch from Jonathan
> > > > to change how g_object_set() works on GtkSettings, in
> > > > particular.)
> > >
> > > i discussed GtkSettings to some extend with jrb recently, and there're
> > > a couple cleanups/improvements that should be done in gtk. but i'm
> > > not aware of anyhing needing to change in g_object_set(), so what's
> > > that patch about?
> >
> > What you discussed with jrb ... making
> >
> >  g_object_set (gtk_settings_get_default (),
> >                "gtk-theme-name", "my-crazy-theme",
> >                NULL);
> >
> > Overide the value from GdkSettings.
> 
> but that requires changes to the setter implementations of GtkSettings
> only, and does not require changes to g_object_set().

Of course. :-). I did not mean to imply otherwise.

                                        Owen