Re: 2.1.3 plans
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: 2.1.3 plans
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:36:12 +0100 (CET)
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Owen Taylor wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'm planning to do a GLib/GTK+-2.1.3 releases this weekend
> > > or early next week.
> > >
> > > I'd like at least the GTK+ release to be declared API frozen;
> > > I'm aware only of one open API issue in GtkTreeView, plus
> > > a couple of semi-api-ish things (a patch from Jonathan
> > > to change how g_object_set() works on GtkSettings, in
> > > particular.)
> >
> > i discussed GtkSettings to some extend with jrb recently, and there're
> > a couple cleanups/improvements that should be done in gtk. but i'm
> > not aware of anyhing needing to change in g_object_set(), so what's
> > that patch about?
>
> What you discussed with jrb ... making
>
> g_object_set (gtk_settings_get_default (),
> "gtk-theme-name", "my-crazy-theme",
> NULL);
>
> Overide the value from GdkSettings.
but that requires changes to the setter implementations of GtkSettings
only, and does not require changes to g_object_set().
>
> Regards,
> Owen
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]