Re: resolved bugs

[Vitaly Tishkov <tvv sparc spb su>]

Sander Vesik wrote:

> > Just a question: why don't anyone changes states of RESOLVED/{FIXED, NOTABUG,
> > DUPLICATE} bugs to 'CLOSED'?
> > Or it should be done by a reporter? If so, I can close over 200 bugs I filed
> > against gtk+ which are RESOLVED...
> >
>
> But why? 'RESOLVED' is a 'CLOSED', just by a different name.

Probably, it's not the same.

Look here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/bug_status.html

RESOLVED
      A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by QA.
      From here bugs are either re-opened and become REOPENED, are
      marked VERIFIED, or are closed for good and marked CLOSED.


Actually, I don't care about it if it's better to leave bugs as RESOLVED/{FIXED,
...}.


Vitaly.