Re: using GTK_VERSION_CHECK in a preprocessor statement
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, gtk-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: using GTK_VERSION_CHECK in a preprocessor statement
- Date: 06 May 2002 17:07:46 -0400
On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 16:54, Owen Taylor wrote:
> jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> > On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 16:33, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 15:15, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > > > jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > also, forte on solaris gives me:
> > > >
> > > > "panel-applet-scan.c", line 705: unexpected "("
> > > > "panel-applet-scan.c", line 707: warning: improper pointer/integer
> > > > combination: op "="
> > >
> > > Are you saying that this goes away when you combine the two lines?
> > on linux, yes. didn't try on solaris - putting out other, bigger fires
> > right now.
> OK, well, when you have more time, I"d appreciate if you could investigate
> further. I can believe that either GCC or Forte would be non-conformant
> with the X standard in some odd cases, but I have trouble believing that
> both of them would have have problem with exactly the same case.
the attached (committed) patch fixed it.
thanks for keeping me on the right track.
"don't get me wrong, i think that radiohead are amazing. i love their
music and i love their ethos, but that thom yorke guy always seems to
be complaining." -- moby
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gtk-doc/gtkdoc-scangobj.in,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.24 gtkdoc-scangobj.in
--- gtkdoc-scangobj.in 5 May 2002 20:10:37 -0000 1.24
+++ gtkdoc-scangobj.in 6 May 2002 21:05:05 -0000
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@
] [Thread Prev