Re: g_string_new_len(const gchar *, GSSIZE) (glib-2.0)
- From: Mark Mielke <mark mark mielke cc>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: g_string_new_len(const gchar *, GSSIZE) (glib-2.0)
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 12:28:14 -0500
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:18:26PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Mark Mielke <mark mark mielke cc> writes:
> > If the GString structure uses gsize, why does g_string_new_len() use
> > gssize?
> Because conventionally whenever you pass in a "len" in glib/gtk, you
> can pass "-1" to mean "nul-terminated, do a strlen() for me"
Sorry... it was a dum question on my part... for some reason I thought
I read "gssize" = "g short size", instead of "gssize" = "g signed size".
31 bit size is quite sufficient for the next 10 years...
Thanks for the response to clear me up on that... :-)
mark
--
mark mielke cc/markm ncf ca/markm nortelnetworks com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]