Re: 2.0.1 plans
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet ACT-Europe FR>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.0.1 plans
- Date: 21 Mar 2002 11:06:27 -0500
Arnaud Charlet <charlet ACT-Europe FR> writes:
> > Right now, there are ~130-140 bugs either on no milestone or on
> > the 2.0.1 milestone. I'd guess that there about 10-15 of those that
> > are good candidates for fixing for 2.0.1, the rest need to get moved
> > to 2.0.2 or 2.2.0. (Anything that we don't think we're going to fix
> > in the next month or so should be moved to 2.2.0)
>
> Well, you realize that by doing so, it most likely means that people won't
> be able to use Gtk+ 2.0.x at all
>
> Gtk+ 2.0 contains many great improvements, but also many bugs and is far from
> being stable, and I don't think having two more releases (2.0.1 & 2.0.2)
> will be enough to stabilize it. Just look at Gtk+ 1.2.x, it became really
> stable around 1.2.6/1.2.8, and I'd say this is expected/normal.
>
Right but 2.2.3, 2.2.4 or so will be out around the same timeframe
that 1.2.6 was out. 2.2.x is ABI-compatible with 2.0, it just adds
the multihead feature and moves to Xft2.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]