Re: cache G_BROKEN_FILENAMES

From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet ACT-Europe FR>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet ACT-Europe FR>
Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: cache G_BROKEN_FILENAMES
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:33:48 +0100

> If you make broken and initialized volatile, you do not have concurrency issues.

Actually I was thinking more about 'atomic' in the Ada sense rather than
volatile, but apparently C does not have such a beast (or does C99 adds
something here ?), so I withdraw my comment about making it work this way
(without using g_thread_init) in a portable way in C.

Arno

References:
- cache G_BROKEN_FILENAMES
  - From: Alex Larsson
- Re: cache G_BROKEN_FILENAMES
  - From: Owen Taylor
- Re: cache G_BROKEN_FILENAMES
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]