Re: GdkLibrary


Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:

>  * Does it make sense to move more functions onto this object;
>    possibilities among newly added 2.2 functions would be:
>     void gdk_parse_args (...) => GdkLibrary *gdk_library_open (...)

while you are changing this part of GDK anyway, would it hurt to to
allow GDK backends to modify the argv array just like gtk_init() and
gdk_init()? This would remove the need for some patching we had to do
to integrate DirectFBInit (int *argc, char **argv[]).

I haven't found the time to look at the HEAD branch, but if you think
this makes sense, I could try to come up with a patch soon.

Salut, Sven

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]