Re: Upcoming GtkTypeFundemental change

Am Sam, 2002-08-10 um 19.06 schrieb Owen Taylor:

> That was suggested in the bugzilla mail; G_MAXLONG would be
> an appropriate, non-fancy define. But it strikes me as
> overengineering, and has some risk of revealing compiler oddities.

Hm, ok.
> I'm not worried about the ugliness ... it's only deprecated compat
> stuff, and the non-deprecated stuff in GLib is even uglier
> (by necessity.)

Why not simply let it remain broken?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]