Re: Proposed GtkTreeView API change

[vishnu pobox com]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:16:42PM -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> vishnu pobox com writes:
> > "row-changed" sounds fine.
> > 
> > > I'd like to do this, though it will break anyone's code who's using
> > > this or writing their own model.  Comments??
> > 
> > i wrote my own model, but i didn't implement "range-changed" yet.
> > 
> > While your at it, consider renaming "reordered" since i mistakenly
> > thought that the "reordered" signal was for reordering a single
> > row, instead of all the rows.  Perhaps "rows-reordered" or
> > "rows-resorted" or "rows-permuted" would be good.
> 
> How would a single row be reordered?

i said i was confused, didn't i?  ;-)

i was thinking that reordered meant a combination of deleted/inserted
on "the same row" to move it to a different position.

> Perhaps you're right, though.  "::row_has_child_toggled", "::row_changed", "::rows_reordered",
> "::row_deleted", and "::row_inserted"?

Yes, i think it helps to know whether the signal is addressing a
single-row or all-the-rows.