Re: construct functions

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming) writes:
> A lot of objects seem to be missing construct functions for language
> bindings. Do I have permission to add these as I discover the need? It
> should be a simple matter of moving code from the _new function to
> _construct functions, then calling those _construct functions from the
> _new functions.

Instead of construct functions, objects are supposed to have
construct-time object properties. If anything requires a construct
function it is broken, file a bug report about it.

Havoc