Re: Separating GdkAtom and Atom
- From: Erwann Chenede <Erwann Chenede Sun COM>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: otaylor redhat com
- Subject: Re: Separating GdkAtom and Atom
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:50:48 +0100 (BST)
[...]
>
>So, we need to add functions to GTK+-2.0 to do the same operations,
>but in a "using the default display" manner. These functions will be
>protected with #ifndef GDK_MULTIHEAD_SAFE in GTK+-2.2. The names I
>have currently are:
>
> Atom gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom (GdkAtom atom);
> GdkAtom gdk_x11_xatom_to_atom (Atom xatom);
> Atom gdk_x11_get_xatom_by_name (const gchar *atom_name);
> gchar * gdk_x11_get_xatom_name (Atom xatom);
>
>I actually like these names considerably better than the
>multihead-branch names, because it's hard for me to keep straight what
>is the "real" atom, and what the "virtual" atom.
>
>But it is rather confusing to use unrelated names for the
>same operations depending on whether there is a GdkDisplay
>parameter or not.
>
>So, we probably should pick one of the following schemes:
>
> gdk_x11_default_atom_to_xatom (GdkAtom atom);
> gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom (GdkDisplay *display, Atom atom);
>
> gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom (GdkAtom atom);
> gdk_x11_display_atom_to_xatom (GdkDisplay *display, GdkAtom atom);
>
> gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom (GdkAtom atom);
> gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom_for_display (GdkDisplay *display, GdkAtom atom);
I'll propage this changes in the multihead branch.
[...]
>
>With the code to implement virtual GdkAtoms in hand, I started
>looking at converting the code in GDK and GTK+ to properly
>use atoms. Even having Erwann's work in gtk-multihead
>as comparison point, it didn't look like a fun job.
>(I started off doing plug and socket in GTK+ and immediately
>found a couple of places where the conversion was missing
>in gtk-multihead.)
Thanks for pointing this out, I'll use our "debugging aid" to check
for any missing conversion.
[..]
>I originally planned to just do this as a transition measure
>turned on with a #define and switch back to the standard gulong define
>later, but on consideration I think it's better to keep it this
>way.
I agree, this could catch bugs earlier rather than later.
[..]
> - Finalize the naming scheme
What else is there to finalize ?
[..]
Erwann
[ I speak for myself, not for Sun ]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Erwann Chénedé, Sun Microsystems Ireland
Desktop Applications & Middleware Group
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]