Re: Pango Binding Advice
- From: Jeff Franks <jcf tpg com au>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Pango Binding Advice
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 04:46:00 +1000
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Omitting leads to one more question. I have classes that derive from a
GObject encapsulation. Would it be reasonable to derived classes
privately from PangoFontFamily and PangoFontFace ignoring the fact they
inherit from GObject. PangoFontFamily and PangoFontFace are declared
within the PANGO_ENABLE_BACKEND define.
Omit. Writing a backend in non-C would be pretty useless.
] [Thread Prev