Re: GTK_DESTROYED not set after gtk_object_destroy() ?

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Mon, 2001-10-08 at 01:50, Murray Cumming wrote:
> So it seemed sensible to use the GDestroyNotify callback that's given to
> g_object_set_data_full(), because that is called indirectly from
> gtk_object_dispose(), which only seems to be called after the last
> destroy. I'm not sure that GDestroyNotify is such a good name..

I really do think that this:

void	 gtk_object_set_data_full    (GtkObject	     *object,
				      const gchar    *key,
				      gpointer	      data,
				      GtkDestroyNotify destroy);

should be this:

void	 gtk_object_set_data_full    (GtkObject	     *object,
				      const gchar    *key,
				      gpointer	      data,
				      GtkDisposeNotify func);

Only the names needs to be changed.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com