Re: Style convention question

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Derek Simkowiak <dereks realloc net> writes: 
> 	Is this just a religous thing?  Or is there some
> backwater-compiler that doesn't support the latter format?
> 

The only reason I can think of is that it forward-declares the type,
so you can use it as an opaque type.

But basically it's just a convention, with no special rationale other
than "it's consistent with all the other code."

Havoc