Re: Pango Performance (was: Re: --gtk-unbuffered)

On  1 Mar, Tor Lillqvist wrote:

>  > +  return (1 == has_glyph);
> It would be preferrable if all of Pango used the same coding style
> conventions. While I certainly understand the rationale for this style
> of writing equality tests, it is nonetheless not used in any of the
> other code, which can be confusing. Or what do others think?

 Just curious: Whats the rationale for this "strange way to code"?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]