Re: g_signal_*

[Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>]

Sven Neumann <sven gimp org> writes:

> Hi,
> 
> Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:
> 
> > I don't disagree with either of these statements, but I don't
> > think deprecating gtk_signal_connect_object() makes 
> > g_signal_connect_object() an acceptable name. There is just
> > too much code out there using gtk_signal_connect_object(),
> > and too many people who know what it does.
> 
> so why don't you just ditch all the gtk_signal_* funcs and
> use g_signal_* everywhere? This will bring attentention to 
> the fact that things have changed.

That might be more than a little cruel to our current users...

-Jonathan