Re: g_signal_*

[Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>]

Hi,

Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:

> I don't disagree with either of these statements, but I don't
> think deprecating gtk_signal_connect_object() makes 
> g_signal_connect_object() an acceptable name. There is just
> too much code out there using gtk_signal_connect_object(),
> and too many people who know what it does.

so why don't you just ditch all the gtk_signal_* funcs and
use g_signal_* everywhere? This will bring attentention to 
the fact that things have changed.


Salut, Sven