Re: g_object_[dis]connect_valist

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Eric Lemings <eric b lemings lmco com> writes:

> Owen Taylor wrote:
> 
> > Could you give a use case?
> 
> Same use case as the other functions.  If I need a wrapper layer around GObject, currently I'd have
> to copy the entire implementation of the g_object_[dis]connect functions.  If there were "valist"
> variants, I'd be able to call these instead with just a few lines of code.

Why would you want to write a wrapper around these functions?

They are exceedingly esoteric C convenience functions...

                                        Owen