Re: GNOME CVS: gtk+ pablo

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:

> On 21 Jun 2001 16:06:14 -0400, Gnome CVS User wrote:
> > 
> > CVSROOT:	/cvs/gnome
> > Module name:	gtk+
> > Changes by:	pablo	01/06/21 16:06:14
> > 
> > Modified files:
> > 	.              : Tag: gtk-1-2 ChangeLog configure.in 
> > 	gtk            : Tag: gtk-1-2 Makefile.am gtkrc.c 
> > Added files:
> > 	gtk            : Tag: gtk-1-2 gtkrc.iso-8859-3 gtkrc.iso-8859-7 
> > 	                 gtkrc.iso-8859-9 gtkrc.utf-8 
> > Removed files:
> > 	gtk            : Tag: gtk-1-2 gtkrc.el gtkrc.eo gtkrc.tr 
> > 
> > Log message:
> > Check for nl_langinfo (CODESET), changed the algorithm ussed to look for
> > locale dependent rc files so it does a better job
> > 
> > URL : http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsquery.cgi?module=gtk+&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=gtk+&file=&filetype=match&who=pablo&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=&date=explicit&mindate=06%2F21%2F01+16%3A06&maxdate=06%2F21%2F01+16%3A06&cvsroot=%2Fcvs%2Fgnome
> 
> gtkrc.c needs to include config.h after this commit.
> 
> ok to commit?

If you want, it's OK to commit that change, but the patch isn't really
"finished", and may cause portability problems in other ways.  If you
want to compile on a non-Linux and/or non-GLIBC platform you should
use GTK+-1.2.10.

I've been intentionally gtk-1-2 head a bit broken until I have time to
look at this a bit more... (the patch is definitely moving in
the right direction, so although it was committed accidentally,
I've left it in.)
 
Regards,
                                        Owen