- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Helmethead <hoshem mel comcen com au>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org, federico ximian com, lewing ximian com
- Subject: Re: GdkPixbufAnimation
- Date: 27 Apr 2001 01:57:24 -0400
Helmethead <hoshem mel comcen com au> writes:
> While on the subject, you should try using the GdkPixbufLoader. I haven't been able to get my head very well around the problems and come up with a solution..
> I vaguely remember some things:
> - Biggest problem is that area_prepared doesn't pass in the new
> pixbuf as documented, making the api unusable
You just call gdk_pixbuf_loader_get_pixbuf() when you get this signal.
> - The api is awkward and crappy to implement. It seems designed for
> applications that don't know whether they want a pixbuf or an
> animation, which is a bit silly.
> - It requires that the first frame of an animation be used as the
> "static image" if that's what the app wants. Maybe this is what you
> want though, I don't know.
I believe you can just ignore the animation part using only the area_*
signals. See gtk-demo, if I've checked in my image demo, I think I
> The loader api also depends on the GtkPixbufFrame style of doing
> things, if you want to abolish it you need to rework the loader I
This is true.
I'm not sure what the semantics of the loader are exactly with
animations, need to think it through.
] [Thread Prev