Re: textview conflicts in C++

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes: 
> It was reported before, and we discussed it some, but we never actually
> fixed it; the main question is what should be used instead as a
> name. I think Havoc was leaning in favor of: 
> 
>  move_cursor
>  delelete_from_cursor
>  insert_at_cursor
>  
> Which are verbose, but unconflicting and clear. (::delete_text
> needs to be reserved for GtkEditable)
> 

I just need to fix these, I'll do it tomorrow and also look at some
other bugs people have mentioned over the weekend (segfault with DND,
etc.)

Havoc