Re: none
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- Cc: James Henstridge <james daa com au>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: none
- Date: 13 Dec 2000 20:45:05 -0500
Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, James Henstridge wrote:
>
> > On 13 Dec 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> > > > what? how's GtkObject deprecated?
> > > >
> > >
> > > It has exactly one feature not found in GObject, which is the
> > > "destroy" signal. Our claim is that "destroy" is only useful for GUI
> > > objects, so "destroy" should really be in GtkWidget. So GtkObject is
> > > just legacy cruft.
> >
> > It also handles the floating reference stuff. Is that also going to be
> > deprecated? It simplifies using GTK from C quite a bit.
>
> nope, that's not deprecated, and the floating will never propagate to GObject.
> read my reply to havoc and be relieved ;)
>
But the same thing I said about "destroy" applies, the floating flag
should be in GtkWidget or in GObject.
GtkObject is a useless node in the inheritance hierarchy; it has no
conceptual purpose.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]