Re: VTree RFC
- From: Havoc Pennington <rhp zirx pair com>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: VTree RFC
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:10:21 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Peter Teichman wrote:
>
> Hmm, that is true. At that point, I would dirty nodes with changed state
> and redraw the tree. I don't know if that is feasable (or desired) with the
> VTree architecture, though.
>
It wouldn't work for gnome-apt because there's no way to know which nodes
changed. (I have to confess I'm only writing this because I need it for
gnome-apt, so it may be non-general-purpose to some extent ;-)
>
> Sounds good to me. Should we add those movement functions, to facilitate
> DnD?
>
Yup, good idea.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]