Re: VTree RFC

On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Peter Teichman wrote:
> Hmm, that is true. At that point, I would dirty nodes with changed state
> and redraw the tree. I don't know if that is feasable (or desired) with the
> VTree architecture, though.

It wouldn't work for gnome-apt because there's no way to know which nodes
changed. (I have to confess I'm only writing this because I need it for
gnome-apt, so it may be non-general-purpose to some extent ;-)

> Sounds good to me. Should we add those movement functions, to facilitate
> DnD?

Yup, good idea.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]