Re: visible vs. is_visible
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: visible vs. is_visible
- Date: 05 Jul 1999 21:42:27 -0400
"Sergio A. Kessler" <ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar> writes:
> Some widgets implements a method "visible" and others implement
> "is_visible" when they want to inform if the widget _is_ visible.
>
> I think the meanings of the last is much more clear.
> (or must be set/get visible ?)
We went on a crusade between GTK+-1.1 and GTK+-1.2 to
make everything that was a getter or a setter be
get_foo() and set_foo().
We didn't do the same for boolean-valued query functions.
Perhaps that will happen at some point in the future...
there should probably be a policy one way or the
other for future naming in any case.
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]