Re: GNOME CVS: gtk+ timur

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik pobox com>]

Is LC_ALL preferred over LC_CTYPE on non-broken systems?  If so, you
should probably test for the brokenness in configure.in, instead of
using LC_CTYPE when LC_ALL is preferred in some cases... 

	Jeff




On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Gnome CVS User wrote:

> CVSROOT:	/debian/home/gnomecvs
> Module name:	gtk+
> Changes by:	timur	99/01/21 13:26:36
> 
> Modified files:
> 	.              : ChangeLog 
> 	gtk            : gtkrc.c 
> 
> Log message:
> Thu Jan 21 16:04:35 1999  Timur Bakeyev <mc@bat.ru>
> 
> * gtk/gtkrc.c (gtk_rc_init): It was reported by Owen Taylor
> <otaylor@redhat.com>, that LC_ALL produce unparsable garbage
> on some glibc'ed systems and HP/UX. So, falling to LC_CTYPE.
> 
> 
> -- 
>          To unsubscribe: mail cvs-commits-list-request@gnome.org with 
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
> 
>