Re: ICCCM compliance question ...
- From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" <andrewl deliverator io com>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: ICCCM compliance question ...
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:15:04 -0600
What about dual-head applications? twm/mwm and it's ilk fire up
two separate window managers for :0.0 and :0.1. Wouldn't this
mean that 1 application which spawned off two windows on different
displays would need two WM_CLIENT_LEADER - one for each display as the
display characteristics could be very different.
Andy Lentvorski
Felix Bellaby wrote:
> Owen replied:
> > [...]
> > I think setting the client leader property to point to
> > the GDK group leader should be fine. (Note that these
> > _are_ distinct concepts in the ICCCM. But people are
> > more likely to want multiple groups in a single app
> > than multiple clients in a single app. So if we don't
> > provide the former I don't see any reason to worry about
> > the latter).
>
>Indeed, the concepts are distinct. gdk already includes the
>ability to set multiple groups (gdk_window_set_group).
>The gdk_leader_window is only used as the DEFAULT group.
>
>Allowing am app to set more than one sm client id would
>violate the protocol. Therefore, I can see no reason whatsoever
>for allowing the creation of more than one WM_CLIENT_LEADER
>window per app.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]