Re: [gtk-list] Memchunks again

On 26 Aug 1999, Soeren Sandmann wrote:

> Soeren Sandmann <> writes:
> > What about the following, then? I am not happy with the check for atom_size
> > [...]
> So, is someone with write access going to commit the patch or
> something else that fixes the bug?

i'm currently catching up with recent patches and emails, so please
be a little more patient on that memchunk issue. at a first glance
though, your last version looked pretty good to me and i agree
that we need something like that in gmem.c.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]