Re: final gtk+maverick battles
- From: Bric <bric flight us>
- To: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: final gtk+maverick battles
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:31:41 -0500
On 02/13/2014 03:37 PM, Bric wrote:
thought I'd move out to a new thread, since we are past the Pango issue
in "reckless abandonment" (sliding irrevocably down the slope of
system trashing) I manually moved *glib* files and directories from
under /usr/local/lib, to a hiding place, then quickly re-installed
("make install") glib from git.
my git gtk+ continued to give me the nasty 2.39.4 vs. 2.39.5
discrepancy error. Then I ./autogen.sh'ed it again... and, lo and
behold, the ./autogen.sh cleared its misunderstanding of what my glib
version was (this, in conjunction with the above deletions, in
/usr/local/lib, I presume)
So, my gtk+ git finally ./configure'd. But then, of course, it had to
snag with this:
http://www.flight.us//misc/gtk_compile_error1.txt
thanks again!!
I decided to upgrade my gcc (tarball 4.8.2). Didn't realize what a
monster of a job that is! It's been compiling for the last 6 hours, on
my core 2 duo. Taking up gigabytes of space!
Meanwhile, back to the trashing. It is apparently already severe. My
glib thing, or whatever. Thanks for the heads up about that.
Any further help would be greatly appreciated, as it may save me from
total catastrophe. For instance, my system just auto-mounted an
external drive, without a problem, apparently. But now when I issue
umount manually, I get:
/sbin/umount.udisks: symbol lookup error:
/usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0: undefined symbol: g_thread_ref
Should I recompile some vital system utilities, against my new, upgraded
libs ??
Before shutting down, that is. What other vital should I test? What
might depend on the glib, etc.?
I realize this is beyond gtk+ but you guys seem to know this stuff a lot
more than I.
Also, a note about outages. I am guessing there are widespread outages
throughout the U.S., so, some list members are not participating because
the can't... (that's already been confirmed on some other lists)
thanks.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]