Append a node to the top level in a GetkTreeStore
- From: Michele Bendazzoli <mickymouse mickymouse it>
- To: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Append a node to the top level in a GetkTreeStore
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:50:01 +0200
Reading the docs of gtk_tree_store_append ():
"Appends a new row to /|tree_store|/. If /|parent|/ is non-|NULL|, then
it will append the new row after the last child of /|parent|/, otherwise
it will append a row to the top level. /|iter|/ will be changed to point
to this new row. The row will be empty after this function is called. To
fill in values, you need to call |gtk_tree_store_set()|
<http://localhost.localdomain/cgi-bin/dwww?type=file&location=/usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-doc/gtk/GtkTreeStore.html#gtk-tree-store-set>
or |gtk_tree_store_set_value()|
<http://localhost.localdomain/cgi-bin/dwww?type=file&location=/usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-doc/gtk/GtkTreeStore.html#gtk-tree-store-set-value>."
Now, if I try the to insert two node at the top level in the same body
procedure, all work as expected: the program create two nodes at the top
level.
But if I call two times the same procedure to update the GtkTreeStore,
the result is not, as expected (at least for me), four node at the top
level, but only two, the last that the procedure insert the second time
was called.
Here is a slice of the program I made to test:
...
add_istruction(istr); //called two times
...
void add_instruction(char *istr) {
...
gtk_tree_store_append (GTK_TREE_STORE(store), &iter, NULL); /*
Acquire an iterator */
gtk_tree_store_set (GTK_TREE_STORE(store), &iter,
N_ISTRUCTION_COLUMN, istr,
CONDITION_COLUMN, "",
ISTRUCTION_COLUMN, istr,
GOTO_COLUMN, "",
-1);
gtk_tree_store_append (GTK_TREE_STORE(store), &iter, NULL); /*
Acquire an iterator */
gtk_tree_store_set (GTK_TREE_STORE(store), &iter,
N_ISTRUCTION_COLUMN, istr,
CONDITION_COLUMN, "",
ISTRUCTION_COLUMN, istr,
GOTO_COLUMN, "",
-1);
...
The fist time istr == "BEGIN", while the second is equal to "STOP". At
the end, the treeview contain only two top nodes labeled "STOP".
Does someone understand why?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
ciao, Michele
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]