Re: tree model complaints
- From: Tim Müller <zen18864 zen co uk>
- To: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: tree model complaints
- Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:47:12 +0100
On Sunday 15 August 2004 15:30, D M wrote:
Yes, thats true, but my point is :no matter how underlaying data
are structred I have to provide both methods ( or even three
- path to iterator conversion)
"both methods" = _iter_next() and _iter_nth_child()? If yes, then how would
one know how to emulate one using the other without either keeping track of
the N of each iter, or doing expensive iter_to_path conversions? Both is
rather pointless just to save those 1% of people who do need to implement
custom tree models 5 lines of code. For most people GtkListStore and
GtkTreeStore will do just fine, the others usually know what they want and
want maximum control (and don't mind an extra 5 lines).
Or maybe I'm just not understanding you right?
Cheers
-Tim
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]