Re: static gchar security



I can't think of a good way other than a reversible hash method. 
However, if you dig into evolution's code you should find out how they
handle it.

--Jason

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 12:45, Jacob Perkins wrote:
It's more of a conveniance function, I'd like to do something similar to
evolution's password caching with gpg.  Also, the app won't be doing
password checking, only the caching, so I don't think I can use md5 since
it'd need to be a 2 way hash.  Is there a way to secure this, or at least
obscure it?

It would be *very* insecure.  Any root-level program could pick up that
password very easily just by examining /dev/kmem.  Why would you want to
store that password for the life of a program anyway?  It's standard
procedure for programs that accept passwords to forget them immediately
after receiving them and doing the authentication.

--Jason

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:41, Jacob Perkins wrote:
How (in)secure would it be to have a static gchar that would save a
plaintext password?  The gchar would start off null, but could later
contain a password, and is static for the life of the app.  Is there a
better way to do this?
--
Jason A. Pfeil                        pfeil 10East com
Senior Open Systems Engineer          http://www.10East.com
10East, Inc.                          (904)220-DOCS



_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-- 
Jason A. Pfeil                        pfeil 10East com
Senior Open Systems Engineer          http://www.10East.com
10East, Inc.                          (904)220-DOCS

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]