Re: Do I have to use thread safety if my GDK layer uses threads?
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: "Brian J. Murrell" <gtk-list-in interlinx bc ca>
- Cc: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Do I have to use thread safety if my GDK layer uses threads?
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:23:33 -0400 (EDT)
"Brian J. Murrell" <gtk-list-in interlinx bc ca> writes:
Hello,
I am writing a GTK+ 2.0 application using the DirectFB GDK layer.
DirectFB is multi-threaded (the GTK program itself runs in the initial
thread). Does that mean that I need to write my GTK+ application in a
"thread safe" manner?
Shouldn't need to .... as long as you only access GTK+ and GDK functions
from one thread. (Assum DirectFB doesn't do anything unexpected.)
The reason I ask is that I came across a problem with my application.
At the start of my application I call:
gtk_init (&argc, &argv);
and gtk_init() does a "bindtextdomain()" and my application is
getting suspended at gtk's call to "bindtextdomain()" with:
3346 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, NULL, [RTMIN], 8) = 0
3346 rt_sigsuspend([] <unfinished ...>
I am assuming that this is an issue with threading and non-safe use of
data and tried getting rid of the bindtextdomain() call in gtk's
gtk_init() function and everything seemed to work fine again.
I am at a loss to figure out what the unsafe data access is however
and how to guard it.
This doesn't look GTK+ related at all ... bindtextdomain() is
part of the 'libintl' library or the C library. The version
in the GNU C library should definitely be thread safe, don't
know about other versions.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]