Re: Configuration files



--- mjaz <mjaz_the_mighty2 yahoo com> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 at 19:52:09 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:24:33AM +0300, Syomin Pavel wrote:
Ok, we have GConf & gnome-config for parse config files. And now is
time to decide to use. I want to write small Gtk+ 2 (or GNOME 2 it
isn't so important) based application for UNIX only, and I can't
make my choise: "What to use: GConf or gnome-config?". Both of this
libraries are part of GNOME project, and will be interesting to know
opinion of GNOME developers.

gnome_config_* is generally considered deprecated for storing
preferences, in favor of gconf. gconf offers various features that are
well-documented on its website or in the 2002 www.linuxsymposium.org
proceedings. But gconf is somewhat more complex to use, there's no
question. And gconf is not good for storing data (as opposed to
prefs).

Havoc

I don't Know If This Will Help But I Have Created A Configuration Library For
Linux Only That Allows You To Write Configuration Files That Look Like
Windows
INI Files.  You Can Download It At
http://www.geocities.com/mighty_the_mighty/

Hope That Helps.
Mjaz


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Error In Page Location.  It Should Be http://www.geocities.com/mjaz_the_mighty/
sorry bout that.
mjaz



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]