Re: About gtk_timeout_add

["Paul" <jarlongl ms21 hinet net>]

> Oven wrote:
> Try the following program - it is more like what GTK+ is doing:
> == timeit.c ====
> #include <stddef.h>
> #include <sys/poll.h>
> int main()
> {
>   int i;
>   for (i=0; i<100; i++)
>     poll(NULL,0,1);
>   return 0;
> }
> =================
> $ time timeit.c
> real 0m2.012s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys  0m0.000s
> That program takes just about 2 seconds to run on my machine. You'd
> have to look at the kernel sources to see why this is twice the
> "resolution" you got with setitimer, but setitimer isn't very useful
> for the kind of things GTK+ is doing - it has to wait for events
> coming in from the X server, and so forth, as well as for the 
> current timeout.
> The corresponding GTK+ program:
> ==========
> #include <gtk/gtk.h>
> int count = 100;
> gboolean
> timeout (gpointer data)
> {
>   count--;
>   if (count == 0)
>     {
>       gtk_main_quit ();
>       return FALSE;
>     }
>   else
>     return TRUE;
> }
>
> int main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
>   gtk_init (&argc, &argv);
>   g_timeout_add (10, timeout, NULL);
>   gtk_main ();
>   return 0;
> }
> ==========
>
> Also takes just about exactly 2 seconds to run. (The few
> milliseconds of overhead you may notice is all the gtk_init()
> call.)

It also takes about 2 seconds to run on my machine.
Thanks. 

Paul Lin