Re: safe shut-down

From: "Michael T. Babcock" <mbabcock fibrespeed net>
To: Henri Torgemane <henrit yahoo-inc com>
Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Carlos Pereira <carlos pehoe civil ist utl pt>, gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: safe shut-down
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 23:02:21 -0500

True enough, sorry for the inference.

I was thinking more of TERM and QUIT but KILL was right there so I just typed
it. ;-)

Henri Torgemane wrote:

You can catch a lot of signal, except KILL.
No matter what you do, the user can send a SIGKILL to your process and stop
it without giving it a fair chance to clean.


--
Michael T. Babcock, C.T.O. FibreSpeed
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock

References:
- Re: safe shut-down
  - From: Carlos Pereira
- Re: safe shut-down
  - From: Havoc Pennington
- Re: safe shut-down
  - From: Michael T. Babcock
- Re: safe shut-down
  - From: Henri Torgemane

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]