Re: [gthumb-list] how to get latest gThumb on Ubuntu 10.10



On 03/27/2011 02:45 PM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> sudo add-apt-repository ppa:webupd8team/gthumb
> sudo apt-get update
> sudo apt-get install gthumb

Thank you! I've installed the new gthumb as instructed. When I run it I get a seg fault (sorry about the word wrapping):

  mecklen pippin:~/Work/gthumb-2.12.2$ dpkg -l | grep gthumb
  ii  gthumb              3:2.13.1-1~webupd8~ an image viewer and browser
ii gthumb-data 3:2.13.1-1~webupd8~ an image viewer and browser - arch-independent files

  mecklen pippin:~/Work/gthumb-2.12.2$ gdb /usr/bin/gthumb
  GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-ubuntu
  Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
  This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
  There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
  and "show warranty" for details.
  This GDB was configured as "i686-linux-gnu".
  For bug reporting instructions, please see:
  <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
  Reading symbols from /usr/bin/gthumb...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
  (gdb) run
  Starting program: /usr/bin/gthumb
  [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
  [New Thread 0xb7fd9b70 (LWP 23807)]
  [New Thread 0xb75ffb70 (LWP 23808)]

(gthumb:23804): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_get_path: assertion `G_IS_FILE (file)' failed

(gthumb:23804): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed

  Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x00780e5e in g_file_get_uri () from /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x00780e5e in g_file_get_uri () from /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0
  #1  0x080b918f in ?? ()
  #2  0x080b91e9 in gth_icon_cache_get_pixbuf ()
  #3  0x0808a76b in _gth_browser_add_file_menu_item_full ()
  #4  0x0808bd91 in ?? ()
  #5  0x08094d09 in ?? ()
  #6  0x08095152 in gth_browser_new ()
  #7  0x080f2993 in ?? ()
  #8  0x080f2c17 in ?? ()
  #9  0x080f2f13 in main ()


Thoughts?

Thanks,
Robert



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]